Evolution
Charles Darwin, high priest of evolution
The theory of evolution is generally regarded as the belief that all living organisms stem from a single common ancestor. The origins of this evolutionary mystical common ancestor remain a riddle wrapped within a puzzle inside an enigma.
Most evolutionists try and divorce the thorny origins question from evolutionary theory, but of course, you cannot have even theoretical evolution without something to evolve from!
From this miracle common ancestor a billion billion lucky accidents followed and slowly but surely, here you are, reading all about it.
The magical ingredient to make evolution possible, is time. Evolutionists believe that if you have enough time, the impossible become inevitable. We can see from star trails alone that the metaphysical notion that the universe is as vast and old as evolutionists need it to be just is not true.
According to believers in evolution, there is an 'embarressment of riches' as regards evidence for evolution. We will surely examine this embarrassment in great detail on other pages.
Evolution - Fact or Theory?
Many armchair evolutionists become annoyed by the phrase 'theory of evolution', which is reason in itself to keep using the term. They insist that in the case of evolution, theory actually means proven fact. They cite evolution to be a 'scientific theory' as opposed to bog standard theory. But what's the difference? According to thefreedictionary.com:
Theory - a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world; an organized system of accepted knowledge that applies in a variety of circumstances to explain a set of phenomena; "theories can incorporate facts and laws and tested hypotheses","true in fact and theory"
Scientific Theory - a theory that explains scientific observations; "scientific theories must be falsifiable"
Falsifiable 1 Capable of being falsified, counterfeited, or, corrupted
2 able to be proven false, and therefore testable; as, most religious beliefs are not falsifiable and are therefore outside the scope of experimental science
Nowhere does it say that calling something a 'scientific' theory suddenly transforms a theory into a fact. What scientific observations are there to prove that your distant ancestors were once amoeba? There are none. As a scientific theory, evolution is falsified on a daily basis by intelligent design and creationist organisations as adequately as the initial theory.
Simply repeating the mantra that evolution is a fact does not make it so. We will see that when we look at the so-called evidence for evolution, it is sadly lacking. In many cases a thorough investigation of empirical facts shows that not only is evolution a silly theory, but impossible.
Evolution - macro and micro - whats the difference?
The main difference is that one is real (micro) and one is imagined (macro). Micro evolution can be described as small changes over time within 'kinds'. A creationist has no problem with the hundreds of breed of dog for example. A child of 3 is able to spot the difference between a dog and a cat. Macro evolution is the fantasy which evolutionists believe happens, although they have absolutely no evidence to back up their belief. Just because evolutionists see a population of white peppered moths 'give way' (natural selection) to a larger population of black peppered moths, they bizarrely equate that to mean a peppered moth was once a fruit fly. Macro evolution is the notion that a reptile may turn into a mammal or a dog into a cat, and has NO evidence to back it up. Lots of little changes cannot bridge genetic gaps which separate what superficially appear to be similar species. This will become apparent on subsequent pages. The deception occurs when macro is claimed to be true based soley on the evidence of micro evolution.
If you have any questions or comments, please email us
Most evolutionists try and divorce the thorny origins question from evolutionary theory, but of course, you cannot have even theoretical evolution without something to evolve from!
From this miracle common ancestor a billion billion lucky accidents followed and slowly but surely, here you are, reading all about it.
The magical ingredient to make evolution possible, is time. Evolutionists believe that if you have enough time, the impossible become inevitable. We can see from star trails alone that the metaphysical notion that the universe is as vast and old as evolutionists need it to be just is not true.
According to believers in evolution, there is an 'embarressment of riches' as regards evidence for evolution. We will surely examine this embarrassment in great detail on other pages.
Evolution - Fact or Theory?
Many armchair evolutionists become annoyed by the phrase 'theory of evolution', which is reason in itself to keep using the term. They insist that in the case of evolution, theory actually means proven fact. They cite evolution to be a 'scientific theory' as opposed to bog standard theory. But what's the difference? According to thefreedictionary.com:
Theory - a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world; an organized system of accepted knowledge that applies in a variety of circumstances to explain a set of phenomena; "theories can incorporate facts and laws and tested hypotheses","true in fact and theory"
Scientific Theory - a theory that explains scientific observations; "scientific theories must be falsifiable"
Falsifiable 1 Capable of being falsified, counterfeited, or, corrupted
2 able to be proven false, and therefore testable; as, most religious beliefs are not falsifiable and are therefore outside the scope of experimental science
Nowhere does it say that calling something a 'scientific' theory suddenly transforms a theory into a fact. What scientific observations are there to prove that your distant ancestors were once amoeba? There are none. As a scientific theory, evolution is falsified on a daily basis by intelligent design and creationist organisations as adequately as the initial theory.
Simply repeating the mantra that evolution is a fact does not make it so. We will see that when we look at the so-called evidence for evolution, it is sadly lacking. In many cases a thorough investigation of empirical facts shows that not only is evolution a silly theory, but impossible.
Evolution - macro and micro - whats the difference?
The main difference is that one is real (micro) and one is imagined (macro). Micro evolution can be described as small changes over time within 'kinds'. A creationist has no problem with the hundreds of breed of dog for example. A child of 3 is able to spot the difference between a dog and a cat. Macro evolution is the fantasy which evolutionists believe happens, although they have absolutely no evidence to back up their belief. Just because evolutionists see a population of white peppered moths 'give way' (natural selection) to a larger population of black peppered moths, they bizarrely equate that to mean a peppered moth was once a fruit fly. Macro evolution is the notion that a reptile may turn into a mammal or a dog into a cat, and has NO evidence to back it up. Lots of little changes cannot bridge genetic gaps which separate what superficially appear to be similar species. This will become apparent on subsequent pages. The deception occurs when macro is claimed to be true based soley on the evidence of micro evolution.
If you have any questions or comments, please email us